Greece introduces Personal Citizen Number for a unified digital identification system.
The United Kingdom's police forces are seeking increased funding to expand their use of facial recognition technology, citing its potential for enhancing national security and crime prevention. This push for advanced surveillance tools has sparked debate over governance, privacy, and public trust.
The government and police forces advocate that facial recognition can bring significant improvements in crime prevention and security. The Home Office claims such systems could lead to substantial reductions in crime, justifying the £10 million spent on live facial recognition vehicles, as well as a £220 million allocation requested by the National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) for broader technology deployment over the next three years.
A key driver for this expansion is operational efficiency, as police view facial recognition as a modernization tool to help identify suspects and expedite investigations. The government is also making it easier for police to access a wide range of image stores, included passport and immigration databases, to strengthen retrospective facial recognition searches.
However, critics argue that fragmented and insufficient regulations govern the use of facial recognition, posing risks to privacy, civil liberties, and public trust. Moreover, legal challenges have demonstrated that facial recognition use can breach privacy rights, data protection, and equality laws.
The lack of a clear legal framework leaves a grey area, eroding public trust and raising questions about the legitimacy of police deployments. Concerns are also growing about the expansion of facial recognition into new and risky realms, such as emotion recognition, further complicating regulatory and ethical oversight.
Notably, the United Kingdom's push to increase its investment in facial recognition technology comes at a time when its use is outpacing the development of comprehensive, risk-based legislation. Stakeholders urge the government to enact such legislation to ensure legitimacy and manage the technology's use effectively.
The Home Office believes that facial recognition technology can lead to a substantial reduction in crime, as they have invested £10 million in live facial recognition vehicles. On the contrary, critics argue that insufficient regulations and potential privacy breaches pose risks to civil liberties and public trust.
