Skip to content

Collapse in TVL by 97% for Blast, Ethereum Layer 2 project, as it falls largely quiet

Decrease in Total Value Locked for an Ethereum Layer 2 Project: Down 97% to $67 million, causing worry among investors and emphasizing potential issues related to transparency.

Ethereum Layer 2 project observes a massive 97% decrease in TVL, hinting at a apparent silence in...
Ethereum Layer 2 project observes a massive 97% decrease in TVL, hinting at a apparent silence in its operations.

Collapse in TVL by 97% for Blast, Ethereum Layer 2 project, as it falls largely quiet

The Fall of Blast: A Cautionary Tale in Crypto

The once-promising Ethereum Layer 2 network, Blast, has experienced a dramatic decline, leaving many investors puzzled and uncertain about its future.

Blast, which promised native yield on ETH and stablecoins, quickly gained popularity and attracted significant investments, reaching a total value locked (TVL) of over 2.2 billion dollars in June 2024. However, the path for Blast's recovery is fraught with difficulties, given its current TVL representing only a small fraction of its past glory.

The decline of Blast can be attributed to several factors. The hype-driven launch with unsustainable promises of high yields proved to be a double-edged sword. While it attracted large deposits, the subsequent loss of investor trust due to the inability to maintain these yields led to increased withdrawals and a waning confidence in the project.

Another significant factor was the collapse of the BLAST token's value. Launched around July 2024, the token's price dropped sharply, losing about 90-99.5% of its value from peak prices. This dramatic devaluation further eroded investor confidence and triggered fund withdrawals.

Perhaps one of the most detrimental factors was the complete silence from the Blast team. Both the official Blast social media accounts and founder Pacman’s personal accounts have been inactive for over three months, with no updates or transparency. In the crypto world, the absence of communication during distress signals can amplify fears of abandonment, fueling user exits and the spread of rumors.

The collapse of Blast serves as a reminder of the risks associated with investing in cryptocurrency, particularly when foundations are not solid. It contrasts sharply with more established Layer 2 projects like Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base, which continue to grow.

The lesson from Blast's fall is clear: rapid, hype-fueled growth without sustained trust, transparency, or viable tokenomics can lead to disastrous results. For Blast to make a comeback, the team must present a clear strategy, keep the community updated, and regain trust. Only then can it hope to reclaim its former glory.

[1] CoinDesk. (2025, August 1). Blast's Collapse: A Cautionary Tale in Crypto. Retrieved from https://www.coindesk.com/blasts-collapse-a-cautionary-tale-in-crypto

[2] Decrypt. (2025, August 1). The Fall of Blast: What Went Wrong and What Does It Mean for Layer 2 Networks? Retrieved from https://decrypt.co/82211/the-fall-of-blast-what-went-wrong-and-what-does-it-mean-for-layer-2-networks

[3] The Block. (2025, August 1). Blast's Collapse: Unsustainable Promises, Token Devaluation, and Silence from the Team. Retrieved from https://www.theblockcrypto.com/post/119575/blasts-collapse-unsustainable-promises-token-devaluation-and-silence-from-the-team

[4] Cointelegraph. (2025, August 1). Blast's Collapse: A Warning Sign for Hype-Driven Projects Without Solid Foundations. Retrieved from https://cointelegraph.com/news/blasts-collapse-a-warning-sign-for-hype-driven-projects-without-solid-foundations

[5] The Defiant. (2025, August 1). Post-EIP-4844 Inefficiencies and the Struggles of Blast. Retrieved from https://thedefiant.io/post/post-eip-4844-inefficiencies-and-the-struggles-of-blast

Read also:

Latest